7.
of the courts of justice was a branch of that possessed
by the nation as an independent sovereign power. The
jurisdiction of the nation, within its own territory, is
necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of
18
no limitation not imposed by itself. Any restriction upon
it, deriving validity from an external source, would imply
a diminution of its sovereignty to the extent of the
restriction, and an investment of that sovereignty, to the
same extent, in that power which could impose such restrict-
ion.
All exceptions, therefore, to the full and complete
power of a nation, within its own territories, must be
traced up to the consent of the nation itself. They could
flow from no other legitimate source.
This consent might be either expressed or implied.
In the latter case it is less determinate, exposed more
to the uncertainties of construction; but, if understood,
not less obligatory.
The world being composed of distinct sovereignties,
possessing equal rights and equal independence, whose mutual
benefit is promoted by intercourse with each other, and by
an interchange of those good offices which humanity dictates
and its wants require, all sovereigns have consented to a
relaxation in practice, under certain peculiar circumstances,
of that absolute and complete jurisdiction, within their
respective territories, which sovereignty confers.
This consent, might, in some instances, be tested
by common usage, and by common opinion growing out of that
usage. A nation would justly, be considered as violating
its faith, although that faith might not be expressly
plighted, which should suddenly, and without previous
•
notice exercise its territorial jurisdiction in a manner
not consonant to the usages and received obligations of
the civilised world.
This perfect equality and absolute independence of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.